Over 89% of users report a 84-93% reduction of their symptoms.

*Reported by AmpCoil users in the Wellness for Humanity Lyme to Wellness Program

Wellness for Humanity Foundation: Lyme to Wellness

Community Pilot Study

Open Sky Yoga Barn, Redding, CT 2019

In 2019, the Wellness for Humanity Foundation launched the first Lyme to Wellness Community Pilot Study, in Connecticut. During this program, twelve Lyme diagnosed individuals worked with the AmpCoil at a local healing facility. A team of local practitioners supported the participants in using the AmpCoil and monitored and recorded each participant's progress throughout the program with great success.

*Data represents 3 months of consistent usage from a small sample size which represents the entire body of users that comprise the WFHF Lyme to Wellness Program participants

All data represented here are preliminary results from a pilot study with notable limitations in scope and experimental design. While these results are meant to help inform future work, they are not to be considered significant in a statistical or scientific sense, and are not meant for distribution, citation, or applied use.

While we are excited to use this data to guide future study, we want to express our knowledge of the limitations of the data which we are sharing. The lack of a “control” group, patients sampled who did not receive the experimental treatment (AmpCoil), makes it much more difficult to attribute any changes observed in this study to the treatment. The low sample size (number of patients observed) in this preliminary study also reduces confidence in the results. It is also worth noting that this study included no control for the “placebo effect” (the possibility that just the belief in treatment will render appreciable benefits, even if there is no actual treatment), which may especially effect results in this study, in which data are self-reported by patients. There is also a lack of consistency in which variables were reported by patients, particularly with some variables, meaning some symptoms have less data points than others. Also, other important co-variates, like patient medical history and whether patients were receiving other care during the study period, were not controlled for, or included in analysis. It is also important to note that while statistical metrics like p or R² values are helpful tools for understanding data, they are often misused and can be misleading; even “significant” results should be taken with skepticism.

Want to Know More?